Showing posts with label japan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label japan. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 May 2019

Tidying Up With Marie Kondo

When this show first appeared on Netflix, I was drawn to its trailer, teasing emotional reveals, personality transformations and an all-round better approach to living life.  However, I held off diving straight in, as it was all about tidying your own home, and I still didn’t have one.  The room I rent is large enough that I can leave socks on the floor and not come across them again for another week, allowing me to pursue the feast and famine approach to tidiness I cultivated during my year abroad in Germany, when renting an even larger room meant that possessions would go unnoticed for months at a time, as long as I could walk around them.  But the days of renting are soon to be behind me, with the purchase of my first flat progressing as fast as the dusty legal staff of a conveyancer up north can process my contracts (ie not very).  Next month, then, I will be a homeowner.  The socks I leave on the floor will be on my own actual floor.  My binary approach to tidying might in fact give way to fastidious house-pride.  With the torture of waiting to move almost over, I decided it was time for a tiny little Japanese lady to tell me how to put my socks away.


So, in Tidying Up With Marie Kondo, Netflix have taken on a best-selling author (our Marie) and given her a show (building on last week’s point about people who make telly probably making their next bit of telly on Netflix (Lunatics) – now people who do other things will be doing their next thing on… you guessed it, Netflix).  TV has a long heritage in telling us what to do.  BBC News coverage has focused in recent times on giving platforms to right-wing politicians.  We had the Supernanny, telling various spoiled brats that their behaviour was “not ’cceptable” when it was their weak parents she should have been punishing.  There was How Clean Is Your House?, hosted by Kim and Aggie as they sniffed people’s grease traps and got elbow deep in their u-bends (leading on to the seminal moment where Kim told someone on Celebrity Big Brother that she “wouldn’t sh*t on [them] if [they] were on fire.”)  And who can forget You Are What You Eat, where “Dr” Gillian McKeith had the audacity to tell people (in a Scottish accent) that they had produced “a poor excuse for a poo” while holding Tupperware filled with their crap.  But once we’ve cleaned our house, made the dinner and raised the bastard kids, who’s going to help us tidy up?  Enter Kondo.


The premise of the show is that Marie goes around a diverse array of American households (mostly within driving distance of LA) to help families whose possessions have begun to posses them.  From empty nesters to expectant parents, new couples transitioning to adulthood or a widow faced daily with her dead husband’s shirts, Marie shows them how to let go of the past and take with them into their future only what they need.  If you’re thinking this sounds like a trashy piece of daytime TV you might find on a channel aimed at women down the bottom of the EPG, then you’d be right.  It is.  But, somehow, with the Netflix name attached, it’s become essential viewing for conversation as an office drone.  Fair play to Kondo, though: without even bothering to learn English, she’s getting herself wheeled out to show us how to organise, fold and store the things we need to live life.


Each of the eight episodes (of surprisingly inconsistent length) unfolds along a certain formula.  Marie Kondo is depositing by a black people-mover in a neighbourhood, gasping whimsically as if she’s never seen a bloody house or pavement before, before trotting up to ring the bell.  Scurrying after her is her translator, Marie Iida.  Each time the door is opened to them, the Maries erupt into high-pitched exclaiming, that I assume is some sort of greeting, which the nervous families then mirror, resulting in the bulk of each show being made of grown adults squealing in doorways and hugging or shaking hands awkwardly.  But that bit somehow never gets tiring, and it’s always edited so you can’t really tell if Marie Iida has been completely ignored again, or if people have bothered to acknowledge the poor dear as an actual human being (with sick language skills).


Desperate for her help, everyone shows Marie Kondo round each nook and cranny of every closet and cupboard so she can judge their mess.  The worse it is, the more she squeaks.  She quite likes to climb in things too, and it’s at these moments you wonder if she isn’t really just taking the piss.  Things then get serious again as she goes through her house-greeting ceremony.  For someone quite jittery and polite, this attention-seeking rigmarole of kneeling on the floor with her eyes closed while everyone wonders how much stranger things will get seems oddly grand.  It’s most powerful when the families join in and realise that the homes whose mess is making their lives a misery are also abodes of fond memories, where they have raised kids and lived through happiness.  You may be touched.


And then off we go, getting out all the clothes (all of them!) to make a mountain of crap tops on a bed.  Marie tells her students to go through them one by one, thanking the ones they are letting go of, and keeping only those that spark joy.  Hopefully they don’t find themselves throwing out all their underpants, but we don’t see this bit as Marie skips off and leaves us all wondering if the family will ever be able to sleep now that their beds are covered in everything they’ve ever (or never) worn.  But I do like this bit – there is something to be said for purging clothes.  Not much is made of where everything ends up – are we talking a landfill, a public burning, or, as some episodes indicate, goodwill?  I’ve been known to go through all my clothes and get rid of anything I’ve not worn between moves, as this means I’m simply packing and unpacking something that serves no purpose.  I do feel guilty for the people in Age UK on Clapham High Street taking my poor style choices, but they have since sent handy emails telling me my unflattering chunky knits have netted £8.33 to stop an old lady from freezing to a switched-off radiator this winter.  Talk about sparking joy!


Over a few weeks, the families tackle everything in their homes, taken through each grouped stage by Marie’s regular visits.  They sort books, categorise papers and toss out toys.  One of the best lessons is number 4: Kimono.  I’m not sure why Japanese dressing gowns get their own category, but that doesn’t stop Marie.  In various interstitials, she talks us through her logic, and we read the subtitles while she whips out the Japanese, but I end up getting distracted when I consider how many syllables it takes to utter the ground-breaking tidying up tip: put things in boxes.  Just when you think a sentence is finished, about ten to twelve more spare vowel sounds tumble out from beneath her rigid fringe.


We crescendo into the reveal scenes at the end.  It’s not always easy to make a tidy wardrobe look like a massive transformation, but the show does its absolute best, all while Marie’s apprentices wax lyrical about their new approach to life.  The slip into hoarderhood is slow and gradual, and everyone seems grateful to have tidied their way out of it, with renewed focus on keeping things spic and span.  If I’m honest, I’ve always enjoyed folding clothes.  An old housemate once accused me of working in a shop while watching me fold my t-shirts, and I have in fact looked on enviously during ill-advised trips to Primark where various assistants wheel round mobile folding platforms to return civilisation to stacks of sweatshop-sewn sweaters that have been disordered by low-income rummaging and perhaps ravaging.  I don’t know; I don’t go in Primark anymore because I’m not a tourist visiting London.  But I do have a recurring dream that involves me putting my folded clothes back in drawers and hanging up shirts.  To dream is to be freed from every restriction that reality imposes, yet I can imagine that it’s only Marie and I whose brains take this liberty and use it to act out banal chores.

I’ll conclude by heroing the real star of the show: Marie Iida.  I’ve already touched on how awkwardly she is edited out, but when it comes to voicing over Marie’s recommendations, Iida’s disembodied vocals are what communicate the KonMari method to us.  Her robotic tone gives everything a stilted and tentative approach to the instructions, but, luckily, these are Americans, and their enthusiasm for not drowning in old crap (as well as their impeccable manners) means there is little forceful resistance to either of the Maries and their lessons.  It remains only for me to say that, yes, if this is how Netflix wants me to tidy my home, then, once I own my home, I will be obeying.  With every penny tied up in fees and the deposit, there won’t be many possessions to tidy, but I’m fairly sure I’ll be sparking joy all over the place.

Saturday, 1 December 2018

Dark Tourist


Continuing with the recent flurry of travel-based posts (Jack Whitehall: Travels With My Father and I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here), I’ve succumbed to the constant appearance of Dark Tourist in my Netflix menu.  It was sat there at the top every time I logged in, promising subversion, alternative lifestyles and the ability to brag about having been to really trendy tourist destinations for optimum office one-upmanship.  For instance, I was just showing off to a colleague about the fact I have been to Portland, Oregon, but I didn’t manage to shoehorn into the conversation I have also visited Austin, Texas, which, together, place me as a hipster traveller, despite the fact that I just made everyone sitting near me listen to Fleur East’s Sax (still a party banger, no matter what anyone says).  But, Dark Tourist is not about food trucks and cool urban scenes.  It’s about going to places you wouldn’t normally associate with Instagram fodder.


However, this seems to be even more hipster than the vegan plastic-free breastfeeding collectives of Portland.  Dark Tourist follows David Farrier, a New Zealand journalist who has always been attracted to death and destruction.  However, in his accent, this sounds more like “dith end distriction”.  He’s a hipster: too cool for a haircut, practical eyewear, non-ironed t-shirts.  Somehow, he’s convinced Netflix to fund his holidays to places that are sad, scary or both.  The people he comes across on these journeys, whether they’re touring the Fukushima radioactive area in Japan or cycling about Alexandra township in Johannesburg, ache with their own coolness about shunning package holidays to the beach in favour of seeing the more disturbing side of human life.


So, dark tourism and normal tourism have something in common: both cause inordinate smugness.  I’ve given some thought as to whether I have ever been a dark tourist.  There was the German exchange when I was fourteen; we made the obligatory visit to Dachau.  Going on to pursue this language all the way through university, I’ve read my fair share of World War II literature, but, at the time, the gravity of the place didn’t register as deeply as I now know it should have.  What I do remember, though, is a very enthusiastic guide taking us to the crematoria and then being slightly appalled by the rest of the class clamouring to take pictures of the ovens which thankfully were never completed in time to be used.  What exactly were they going to do with those images?  Enjoy them at a later date (remembering that this was many years before Facebook, let alone digital cameras)?  More recently, embracing the dark tourist mantra of being open to danger, I recall sitting on my cousin’s veranda in KwaZulu Natal while her son ran off into the bushes with a gun to investigate the sounds of potential intruders.  I just sipped my coffee because, as everyone knows, on holiday you’re immortal.  Especially if you’re a plucky Brit.  Right?


Chances are, we’ve all been dark tourists.  If you’ve ever been to a museum or a memorial or a battlefield, then the sights you’re seeing are rooted in some form of human suffering.  Farrier takes a muted approach to this: he’s not overly deferential or crudely exploitative.  He acknowledges his interest while also trying to understand it.  Nevertheless, it’s uncomfortable viewing, whether you’re witnessing voodoo animal slaughter in Benin, or, closer to home, coming to terms with the fact that England is very much on the list for dark tourism.  But our contribution is not necessarily the site of a transgression, but a museum that makes an exhibit of many: Littledean.  We can never quite make our mind up about the proprietor, but suspending judgment is part of the fascination.  Why else can’t we help watching Making A Murderer, if not for the constant challenges to our certainty about guilt and innocence?


Dark Tourist is at its best when breaking into a closed state or authoritarian regime.  The segments that cover Turkmenistan and Myanmar are particularly gripping.  For me, it’s handy that Farrier is investigating these places that I’ll probably never go to, taking risks and breaking into forbidden territory, whether this is due to free radicals or ethnic tensions.  But it all boils down to the ultimate means by which we justify anything we pursue in our leisure time: it’s entertaining.  We go on holiday to look, point and experience because it’s a diversion from daily life.  Watching a TV show that allows us to do this in shonkier locations but with no risk to ourselves is therefore highly entertaining, all pleasantly hosted by a southern hemisphere Louis-Theroux-alike.  It’s left me wanting to know more about all the subjects covered, precisely because Dark Tourist’s premise is to understand why people want to go there, rather than needing to go into the detail of what actually happened.  Booking details don’t follow each report and there’s no suntanned Judith Chalmers sipping a cocktail and having a jolly nice time, but there’s a curiously inspirational bent to the show: you’ll want to go and be a braver, darker tourist yourself.  I can’t explain why, buy you’ll wish you were there, all whilst being glad you’re not.