Sometimes watching TV can be torture. Granted, it often comes with the accompanying
sentiment that you could be doing something better with your time: connecting
with family members, perhaps, or making a difference in your community by
volunteering to help those in need. Once
you’ve quashed those feelings by persuading yourself that you’ve worked hard
enough all week and you’re perfectly entitled to exist inertly on the sofa
while images are beamed into your head for the purpose of entertainment though,
it’s the content on that hypnotising and paralysing screen that can cause
untold pain. Whether it’s the bodies on Love Island that you will never have, or the
bright young things who are already better than you on University Challenge, the sought-after escapism
can sometimes give way to unavoidable introspection, leading to an analysis of
your reality that makes you feel worse than you did when you popped the telly
on. Enter, then, Years And Years.
An evening peak drama of course has the artistic license to
fabricate a world where things happen that are more interesting than daily
life. Downton
Abbey mixed ye olde moral compass with the foibles of servant management. Line Of Duty
poses the question: what if all those coppers are bent? Either way, they offer distance from our
humdrum existences, making the characters’ often terrible experience seem
exciting and diverting. Conversely,
Years And Years can only fill its audience with dread. Its narrative device? It’s set a little bit in the future. Not quite the virtual reality-dominated
future of Black Mirror where attaching
little metallic discs to your temple is all you need to enter wholly into an
alternative reality. No, we’re talking a
few months’ away. Things that might
happen next year, and the year after, and then, as a result, a few years after
that as well.
Why would this be so terrifying? Two things: not actually knowing what will
happen and fearing that the worst-case scenario will win out over the
best. And it’s so near that it’s not a
single future that’s been imagined and will affect subsequent generations. It’s what we ourselves might have to go
through as our lives progress. 2019
headlines veer from climate crisis to Brexit farce via alt-right resurgence,
neoliberal inequality and the rejection of truth in favour of malleable
feeling. Our future is not looking bright,
it’s looking orange (if there’s more Trump and that). Weathering this onslaught of one thing after
the other, our everyman Lyons family boldly goes where a pessimistic media has
long predicted we will all end up.
But the Lyons aren’t like most families. This is because they talk on the phone in group
chats all the time. My own family mostly
communicates by a Whatsapp group I set up a few years back. In it, my sister and parents coordinate my niece’s
schedule of educational and extra-curricular activities, my niece herself
hijacks the group to use all the emojis at once or to leave voicenotes of her
wailing comically, and my mum plumbs new depths of autocorrect mayhem that I am
now expert at deciphering. Conversely, the
Lyons, who are split into the five constituent units of four adult siblings and
their grandmother, chat through their latest news, pass comment on the world around
them and pursue passive-aggressive banter.
In the first example of future technological advancement, they do all
this through the voice-activated Signor service, a kind of Alexa-type gadget
that actually seems to serve a purpose.
Now, if you thought I was going to make a comment on the
family’s diversity, you can get off now.
The Lyons’ ticking of every box in this area might be a socially conscious
casting director’s wet dream, but each Lyon is so much more than an exercise in
representation, even though their very visibility on screen is significant to
communities that don’t always see themselves reflected in their own entertainment. If, along the way, even some viewers move
beyond seeing people as categories and instead view them as individuals, then
it can’t hurt for Years And Years to avail itself of the full spectrum of human
potential. So, who are these Lyons onto
whom the near future is projected?
Our grand-matriarch comes in the form of Anne Reid (a favourite from dinnerladies), providing a lens on the
encroaching of the future into family life that has both the confusion and the
liberal attitude of old age. Rory Kinnear is Stephen
Lyons, the settled wealthier son, husband and dad of two, contrasting with his sister,
Edith, who has been off around the world on moral missions (played by Jessica Hynes, whose
amazing performance as Cheryl in The Royle
Family I am currently reliving to great joy). Feisty younger sister Rosie, meanwhile,
succumbs to a more reflexive response to the events that engulf the family,
while Danny Lyons, played by Russell Tovey (who
should be in more, if not all, things) has a more idealistic approach to the
ensuing calamity.
And calamity is what does ensue. Each episode is interspersed with a number of
montages that take us through the course of time, showcasing the family
birthdays that mark each passing year as we journey into 2020 and the decade
beyond. Sound-tracked by a choir singing,
this change of pace propels us into disaster each time – so much so, in fact,
that you begin to dread its every appearance.
I now have a phobia of choirs singing, as they herald bad things. Inhumane legislation creeps in, international
tensions escalate, environments are plundered and, throughout, the British media
and public make multiple catastrophic decisions. Punctuating each of these current affairs
round-ups is Emma
Thompson (as if the cast weren’t already strong enough), having the time of
her life as Vivienne Rook, some sort of Lady Farage (yet, here’s a lie) whose
emergent and morally ambiguous political party gradually grows from a fringe
movement to a mainstream force for wrong (ring any bells?).
Not only is there the human drama of the Lyons, then, with
arguments, infidelity and deep-rooted resentment, but this is compounded by the
consequences of the future’s news. And
the nature of compounding, is that it happens over and over (like in The Mandibles by Lionel Shriver). Each montage screws them more than the one before,
and in every area of their lives: employment, freedom, healthcare, housing,
human rights etc. Very occasionally, the
relation of this back to the storyline is a touch wedged: some clunking lines
swing in overhead to set out the wider political context. Parts of the technological advancement also
tip things unnecessarily from thought-provoking drama to science fiction
fantasy, but there’s no reason a TV show can’t be both. Whatever this is, it’s wildly entertaining,
if you can stand the torture. We’re not
yet through all six episodes, but you always know something bad is going to happen,
just like with the future in real life.
I’m pinned into my sofa at each viewing on BBC iPlayer and almost
crumble under the tension of every time-accelerating montage – here we go again…
to oblivion. It really is potluck who
will make it through each episode. Just
like it’s potluck who’ll make it through our real future.
I watched this intermingled with episodes of Chernobyl. And while I had to figure out whether I wanted to cry or throw-up as the historical tragedies played out, it was Years and Years that creeped me out with its plausible playing out of our neR future.
ReplyDeleteHi Mike - thanks for your comment. Definitely agree that plausibility is the most terrifying part of the threat right now. I'll be covering Chernobyl in the coming months so be sure to come back for that and let me know what you think.
Delete