I wasn’t sure if I was going to write about this show. In fact, I had already decided that I wouldn’t. It was never up for debate whether I would watch
it. I was committed to viewing the whole
thing the minute its PR machine swung into action and my daily trawling of the Guardian app for things to read that
are relevant without being depressing (favouring articles about slavers’
statues being thrown into rivers at the expense of content relating to Tory
gammonflakes personifying genuine incompetence and alarming inhumanity) saw me
clicking on anything and everything to do with Michaela Coel. Regular readers will have noted in my post on
Chewing Gum that I have strong feelings
about Michaela. I’m not being funny (and,
indeed, those same regular readers (both of them) will know I rarely am) but I
am committed to her being recognised with national treasure status. Friends are still only just uncovering Chewing Gum in lockdown, but if you’re
expecting the same laughs generated by our Tracey, you’re in the wrong boxset.
I wasn’t going to write about it because I wasn’t sure I
would have anything of value to say. But
now I am definitely writing about it. I
should have expected this, but I May Destroy You
is a deeply affecting piece of television.
I have no choice but to throw my unwanted voice into the mix of unpopular
online commentators looking to influence others’ behaviour. As such, I urge everyone to watch this. I’m not sure if the BBC felt the same, scheduling broadcasts of
the twelve half-hour episodes in late-peak Monday-and-Tuesday pairs over the
last few weeks, though the whole thing was available on iPlayer
throughout. We’ll get into why it’s a
necessary watch, but I’ll first take it upon myself to tell you how to watch it
as well. Put your phone in a different
room, settle down somewhere comfortable, give the screen your full attention
and, most importantly of all, make sure nobody else is in the room who might
make you feel awkward about some of the scenes that will ensue.
Like her previous hit, I May Destroy You has roots in Coel’s
own real-life experiences. However, if I
were to say what it’s about, I would need to cop out with a list of
things. First and foremost, it deals
with consent, particularly in the sexual sphere, and more specifically, the
lack of it. Whether this absence relates
to hard-and-fast undeniable crimes, or shifts into a spectrum of permissibility
that examines the interplay between deception and reticence, it’s a journey
that is gruesomely fascinating. The
hooks that this series gets into you latch in deeply and quickly, and soon the
onscreen action captures your attention to such an extent that you won’t even
have twitching thumbs for your phone in the next room. It’s a challenge on all levels. Yet, it’s also entertaining, rewarding each
provoked thought with a gem of universality, a raised eyebrow of humour or an
eyeful of delicious delicious cinematography.
I promised myself I wouldn’t gush till the fourth paragraph,
but it’s too late now. You’ll get the
point though: I rate this show. Coel, whom
I’d watch do anything, plays the central role of Arabella, a new writer
approaching the twilight of her young adulthood. She can follow her impulses to make bad
choices, both enabled and thwarted by her two best friends: wannabe actress
Terry (Weruche Opia)
and Grindr addict Kwame (Paapa
Essiedu). These three things are
brighter and younger than I’ll ever be, forming a sparkling trilogy of
city-dwelling points of intrigue.
Through their lenses, we examine the discourses on consent that form our
various plots. But we look at so much
more: race, gender, relationships, ambition, creativity, youth, family,
heritage.
As if these three didn’t have mileage enough, they are
surrounded by a seemingly endless swirl of supporting cast. Coel creates the unique situation where you
want to find out more about every incidental character and supporting role. They are not just there as a foil or device
to contrive along our next plot beat.
Why is Susy Henny so manipulative?
What has become of Theo (credit to Harriet Webb for genuinely making
me forget I was watching acting)? Why
can’t I work Simon out at all? In an honest
reflection of London’s diversity, the glorious casting of such talent really
lands the point that we’re all sick of seeing so many white people on TV. In the neat packaging of the twelve episodes,
you’ll find yourself wondering what happened to so and so from an earlier
instalment, proving that Coel has created a universe of such credibility that
it presents as truly real. But, in
throwing out the generic rulebook about how a drama should be constructed, that
universe is also as enhanced as the colours of Arabella’s various wigs. Suddenly we’re in Italy, then we’re back in
the noughties, then we’ve moved on from those people to these people – keep up. Coel doesn’t need your rules.
I only hope we continue to give Michaela Coel carte blanche
to tell her stories. The burden on one
person to produce and replicate such quality TV must be enormous. Even the soundtrack feels laced with sly nods
to a greater understanding of her own message (great to hear Babycakes again). She’s taken on sexual assault and revenge,
creating in the process something that demands everyone’s attention, dancing
between gravity and levity, but ultimately making you hold your breath through
each episode. This is intense viewing
and I would like part two straightaway please.
And this is why I wasn’t going to write about it, because my only response
would be to ask for more.
No comments:
Post a Comment